Which doctrine addresses unjust enrichment when there is no contract between the parties?

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $24.99Unlock all

Prepare for the Landlord Tenant Board LSO Licensing Exam. Utilize various study tools such as flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each offering hints and explanations. Enhance your readiness for success on your exam today!

Multiple Choice

Which doctrine addresses unjust enrichment when there is no contract between the parties?

Explanation:
Unjust enrichment is the principle that you shouldn’t be allowed to profit at someone else’s expense without a justified basis, and it governs recovery when there’s no contract. Since there’s no contract, you can’t claim damages for breach or compel performance. The appropriate response is to prevent the unfair gain by restoring the value of the benefit conferred, i.e., restitution, which is the remedy tied to this doctrine. So, when one party has been enriched without a contractual entitlement, the law looks to unjust enrichment to justify returning the value of that enrichment to the other party.

Unjust enrichment is the principle that you shouldn’t be allowed to profit at someone else’s expense without a justified basis, and it governs recovery when there’s no contract. Since there’s no contract, you can’t claim damages for breach or compel performance. The appropriate response is to prevent the unfair gain by restoring the value of the benefit conferred, i.e., restitution, which is the remedy tied to this doctrine. So, when one party has been enriched without a contractual entitlement, the law looks to unjust enrichment to justify returning the value of that enrichment to the other party.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy